Comparison View

Formal Consolidation |  2000 RevEd
Offence of prejudicing investigation
49.—(1)  Where, in relation to an investigation into drug trafficking or criminal conduct, as the case may be, an order under section 30 has been made or has been applied for and has not been refused or a warrant under section 34 has been issued, a person who, knowing or suspecting that the investigation is taking place, makes any disclosure which is likely to prejudice the investigation shall be guilty of an offence.
[25/99]
(2)  In proceedings against a person for an offence under this section, it is a defence to prove that —
(a)he did not know or suspect that the disclosure was likely to prejudice the investigation; or
(b)he had lawful authority or reasonable excuse for making the disclosure.
(3)  Any person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $30,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.
[44
Informal Consolidation | Amended Act 21 of 2014
Offence of prejudicing investigation
49.—(1)  Where, in relation to an investigation into drug dealing or criminal conduct, as the case may be, an order under section 30 has been made or has been applied for and has not been refused or a warrant under section 34 has been issued, a person who, knowing or suspecting that the investigation is taking place, makes any disclosure which is likely to prejudice the investigation shall be guilty of an offence.
[25/99]
[Act 21 of 2014 wef 01/09/2014]
(2)  In proceedings against a person for an offence under this section, it is a defence to prove that —
(a)he did not know or suspect that the disclosure was likely to prejudice the investigation; or
(b)he had lawful authority or reasonable excuse for making the disclosure.
(3)  Any person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $30,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.
[44