Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 42 to 44 when relevant
45.  Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in sections 42, 43 and 44 are irrelevant unless the existence of such judgment, order or decree is a fact in issue or is relevant under some other provision of this Act.
Illustrations
     (a)  A and B separately sue C for a libel which reflects upon each of them. C in each case says that the matter alleged to be libellous is true, and the circumstances are such that it is probably true in each case or in neither.
     A obtains a decree against C for damages on the ground that C failed to make out his justification. The fact is irrelevant as between B and C.
     (b)  [Deleted by Act 15 of 2019 wef 01/01/2020]
     (c)  A has obtained a decree for the possession of land against B. C, B’s son, murders A in consequence.
     The existence of the judgment is relevant as showing motive for a crime.
     (d)  A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft.
     The previous conviction is relevant as a fact in issue.
     (e)  A is tried for the murder of B. The fact that B prosecuted A for libel and that A was convicted and sentenced is relevant under section 8 as showing the motive for the fact in issue.