Comparison View

Amendments are not highlighted in legislation amended before 2012. We are working on it.
Formal Consolidation | 1985 RevEd
Seditious tendency
3.—(1)  A seditious tendency is a tendency —
(a)to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;
(b)to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;
(c)to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;
(d)to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;
(e)to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
(2)  Notwithstanding subsection (1), any act, speech, words, publication or other thing shall not be deemed to be seditious by reason only that it has a tendency —
(a)to show that the Government has been misled or mistaken in any of its measures;
(b)to point out errors or defects in the Government or the Constitution as by law established or in legislation or in the administration of justice with a view to the remedying of such errors or defects;
(c)to persuade the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in Singapore; or
(d)to point out, with a view to their removal, any matters producing or having a tendency to produce feelings of ill-will and enmity between different races or classes of the population of Singapore,
if such act, speech, words, publication or other thing has not otherwise in fact a seditious tendency.
(3)  For the purpose of proving the commission of any offence under this Act, the intention of the person charged at the time he did or attempted to do or made any preparation to do or conspired with any person to do any act or uttered any seditious words or printed, published, sold, offered for sale, distributed, reproduced or imported any publication or did any other thing shall be deemed to be irrelevant if in fact such act had, or would, if done, have had, or such words, publication or thing had a seditious tendency.
Informal Consolidation | Amended Act 42 of 2005
Seditious tendency
3.—(1)  A seditious tendency is a tendency —
(a)to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;
(b)to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;
(c)to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;
(d)to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;
(e)to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
(2)  Notwithstanding subsection (1), any act, speech, words, publication or other thing shall not be deemed to be seditious by reason only that it has a tendency —
(a)to show that the Government has been misled or mistaken in any of its measures;
(b)to point out errors or defects in the Government or the Constitution as by law established or in legislation or in the administration of justice with a view to the remedying of such errors or defects;
(c)to persuade the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in Singapore; or
(d)to point out, with a view to their removal, any matters producing or having a tendency to produce feelings of ill-will and enmity between different races or classes of the population of Singapore,
if such act, speech, words, publication or other thing has not otherwise in fact a seditious tendency.
(3)  For the purpose of proving the commission of any offence under this Act, the intention of the person charged at the time he did or attempted to do or made any preparation to do or conspired with any person to do any act or uttered any seditious words or printed, published, sold, offered for sale, distributed, reproduced or imported any publication or did any other thing shall be deemed to be irrelevant if in fact such act had, or would, if done, have had, or such words, publication or thing had a seditious tendency.