PART V
MUTUAL ASSISTANCE AND EXTRADITION
Interpretation of this Part
31.  In this Part —
“Convention” means the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9th December 1999;
“country” includes a State or territory, as the case may be.
Convention as basis for assistance under Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act
32.—(1)  Where there is no treaty, memorandum of understanding or other agreement in force between Singapore and a country which is a party to the Convention relating to the provision of assistance concerning any terrorism financing offence, an order under section 17 of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act (Cap. 190A) may be made —
(a)declaring that country as a prescribed foreign country; and
(b)applying that Act as if there were a treaty, memorandum of understanding or other agreement under which that country has agreed to provide assistance in criminal matters to Singapore.
(2)  Where the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act is applied under subsection (1), the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act shall, subject to subsection (3), have effect as if the only foreign serious offences within the meaning of that Act were terrorism financing offences.
(3)  Subsection (2) is without prejudice to any other order made under section 17 of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act (Cap. 190A).
(4)  For the purposes of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, a terrorism financing offence —
(a)wherever committed, shall be deemed to be a foreign serious offence; and
(b)shall not be deemed to be an offence of a political character.
Extradition
33.—(1)  There shall be deemed to be included in the list of offences in the First Schedule to the Extradition Act (Cap. 103) all terrorism financing offences.
(2)  Subject to subsection (3), where no extradition treaty is in force between Singapore and a Convention country, a notification in the Gazette under section 4 of the Extradition Act may be made applying that Act as if there were an extradition treaty between Singapore and that country.
(3)  Where the Extradition Act is applied under subsection (2), that Act shall have effect in relation to that country as if the only extradition crimes under that Act were the relevant offences of that country.
(4)  Subsection (3) is without prejudice to any other notification made under section 4 of the Extradition Act.
(5)  Where —
(a)an extradition treaty is in force between Singapore and a Convention country; and
(b)the treaty does not provide for the extradition of persons accused of or convicted of a relevant offence of that country,
a notification in the Gazette under section 4 of the Extradition Act (Cap. 103) may be made applying that Act in relation to that country as if the treaty provided for the matter referred to in paragraph (b).
(6)  Where a notification referred to in subsection (5) is made, any limitation, condition, exception or qualification specified in any other notification made under section 4 of the Extradition Act, or in any Order in Council referred to in section 3 of that Act, in relation to that country shall, to the extent that it prevents the relevant offence from being considered an extradition crime in relation to that country, be disregarded in the application of that Act in relation to that country.
(7)  For the purposes of the Extradition Act —
(a)any act, wherever committed, which is a relevant offence of a Convention country in the case of which that Act has been applied by a notification in the Gazette made under section 4 of that Act, shall be deemed to be an offence within the jurisdiction of that country; and
(b)any such offence shall be deemed not to be an offence of a political character.
(8)  In this section —
“Convention country” means a country which is a party to the Convention;
“relevant offence”, in relation to a Convention country, means an offence against the law of, or of part of, that country where the act or omission constituting the offence or the equivalent act or omission would, if it took place in or within the jurisdiction of Singapore —
(a)constitute a terrorism financing offence; or
(b)be such an offence if the description concerned contained a reference to any intent or state of mind on the part of the person committing the offence, or to any circumstance of aggravation, necessary to constitute the offence.
[30/2008 wef 17/12/2008]