PART 2
PROCEEDINGS IN SINGAPORE BY OR AGAINST
OTHER STATES
Immunity from jurisdiction
General immunity from jurisdiction
3.—(1)  A State is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of Singapore except as provided in the following provisions of this Part.
(2)  A court is to give effect to the immunity conferred by this section even though the State does not file and serve a notice of intention to contest or not contest in the proceedings in question.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
Exceptions from immunity
Submission to jurisdiction
4.—(1)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings in respect of which it has submitted to the jurisdiction of the courts of Singapore.
(2)  A State may submit after the dispute giving rise to the proceedings has arisen or by a prior written agreement; but a provision in any agreement that it is to be governed by the law of Singapore is not to be regarded as a submission.
(3)  A State is deemed to have submitted —
(a)if it has instituted the proceedings; or
(b)subject to subsections (4) and (5), if it has intervened or taken any step in the proceedings.
(4)  Subsection (3)(b) does not apply to intervention or any step taken for the purpose only of —
(a)claiming immunity; or
(b)asserting an interest in property in circumstances such that the State would have been entitled to immunity if the proceedings had been brought against it.
(5)  Subsection (3)(b) does not apply to any step taken by the State in ignorance of facts entitling it to immunity if those facts could not reasonably have been ascertained and immunity is claimed as soon as reasonably practicable.
(6)  A submission in respect of any proceedings extends to any appeal but not to any counterclaim unless it arises out of the same legal relationship or facts as the claim.
(7)  The head of a State’s diplomatic mission in Singapore, or the person for the time being performing his or her functions, is deemed to have authority to submit on behalf of the State in respect of any proceedings; and any person who has entered into a contract on behalf of and with the authority of a State is deemed to have authority to submit on its behalf in respect of proceedings arising out of the contract.
Commercial transactions and contracts to be performed in Singapore
5.—(1)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to —
(a)a commercial transaction entered into by the State; or
(b)an obligation of the State which by virtue of a contract (whether a commercial transaction or not) falls to be performed wholly or partly in Singapore,
but this subsection does not apply to a contract of employment between a State and an individual.
(2)  This section does not apply if the parties to the dispute are States or have otherwise agreed in writing; and subsection (1)(b) does not apply if the contract (not being a commercial transaction) was made in the territory of the State concerned and the obligation in question is governed by its administrative law.
(3)  In this section, “commercial transaction” means —
(a)any contract for the supply of goods or services;
(b)any loan or other transaction for the provision of finance and any guarantee or indemnity in respect of any such transaction or of any other financial obligation; and
(c)any other transaction or activity (whether of a commercial, industrial, financial, professional or other similar character) into which a State enters or in which it engages otherwise than in the exercise of sovereign authority.
Contracts of employment
6.—(1)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to a contract of employment between the State and an individual where the contract was made in Singapore or the work is to be wholly or partly performed in Singapore.
(2)  Subject to subsections (3) and (4), this section does not apply if —
(a)at the time when the proceedings are brought the individual is a national of the State concerned;
(b)at the time when the contract was made the individual was neither a citizen of Singapore nor habitually resident in Singapore; or
(c)the parties to the contract have otherwise agreed in writing.
(3)  Where the work is for an office, agency or establishment maintained by the State in Singapore for commercial purposes, subsection (2)(a) and (b) does not exclude the application of this section unless the individual was, at the time when the contract was made, habitually resident in that State.
(4)  Subsection (2)(c) does not exclude the application of this section where the law of Singapore requires the proceedings to be brought before a court in Singapore.
(5)  In this section, “proceedings relating to a contract of employment” includes proceedings between the parties to such a contract in respect of any statutory rights or duties to which they are entitled or subject as employer or employee.
Personal injuries and damage to property
7.  A State is not immune as respects proceedings in respect of —
(a)death or personal injury; or
(b)damage to or loss of tangible property,
caused by an act or omission in Singapore.
Ownership, possession and use of property
8.—(1)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to —
(a)any interest of the State in, or its possession or use of, immovable property in Singapore; or
(b)any obligation of the State arising out of its interest in, or its possession or use of, any such property.
(2)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to any interest of the State in movable or immovable property, being an interest arising by way of succession, gift or bona vacantia.
(3)  The fact that a State has or claims an interest in any property does not preclude any court from exercising in respect of it any jurisdiction relating to the estates of deceased persons or mentally disordered persons or to insolvency, the winding up of companies or the administration of trusts.
(4)  A court may entertain proceedings against a person other than a State even though the proceedings relate to property —
(a)which is in the possession or control of a State; or
(b)in which a State claims an interest,
if the State would not have been immune had the proceedings been brought against it or, in a case within paragraph (b), if the claim is neither admitted nor supported by prima facie evidence.
Patents, trade marks, etc.
9.  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to —
(a)any patent, trade mark or design belonging to the State and registered or protected in Singapore or for which the State has applied in Singapore;
(b)an alleged infringement by the State in Singapore of any patent, trade mark, design or copyright; or
(c)the right to use a trade or business name in Singapore.
Membership of bodies corporate, etc.
10.—(1)  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to its membership of a body corporate, an unincorporated body or a partnership which —
(a)has members other than States; and
(b)is incorporated or constituted under the law of Singapore or is controlled from or has its principal place of business in Singapore,
being proceedings arising between the State and the body or its other members or (as the case may be) between the State and the other partners.
(2)  This section does not apply if provision to the contrary has been made by an agreement in writing between the parties to the dispute or by the constitution or other instrument establishing or regulating the body or partnership in question.
Arbitrations
11.—(1)  Where a State has agreed in writing to submit a dispute which has arisen, or may arise, to arbitration, the State is not immune as respects proceedings in the courts in Singapore which relate to the arbitration.
(2)  This section has effect subject to any contrary provision in the arbitration agreement and does not apply to any arbitration agreement between States.
Ships used for commercial purposes
12.—(1)  This section applies to —
(a)Admiralty proceedings; and
(b)proceedings on any claim which could be made the subject of Admiralty proceedings.
(2)  A State is not immune as respects —
(a)an action in rem against a ship belonging to that State; or
(b)an action in personam for enforcing a claim in connection with such a ship,
if, at the time when the cause of action arose, the ship was in use or intended for use for commercial purposes.
(3)  Where an action in rem is brought against a ship belonging to a State for enforcing a claim in connection with another ship belonging to that State, subsection (2)(a) does not apply as respects the firstmentioned ship unless, at the time when the cause of action relating to the other ship arose, both ships were in use or intended for use for commercial purposes.
(4)  A State is not immune as respects —
(a)an action in rem against a cargo belonging to that State if both the cargo and the ship carrying it were, at the time when the cause of action arose, in use or intended for use for commercial purposes; or
(b)an action in personam for enforcing a claim in connection with such a cargo if the ship carrying it was then in use or intended for use for commercial purposes.
(5)  In subsections (2), (3) and (4), references to a ship or cargo belonging to a State include references to a ship or cargo in its possession or control or in which it claims an interest; and, subject to subsection (4), subsection (2) applies to property other than a ship as it applies to a ship.
Customs duties, etc.
13.  A State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to its liability for —
(a)any customs duty or excise duty;
(b)any goods and services tax; or
(c)any tax in respect of premises occupied by it for commercial purposes.
Procedure
Service of process and judgments in default of notice of intention to contest or not contest
14.—(1)  Any writ or other document required to be served for instituting proceedings against a State must be served by being transmitted through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore, to the ministry of foreign affairs of that State, and service is deemed to have been effected when the writ or document is received at that ministry.
(2)  Any time for filing and serving a notice of intention to contest or not contest (whether prescribed by Rules of Court or otherwise) begins to run 2 months after the date on which the writ or document is so received.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
(3)  A State which files and serves a notice of intention to contest or not contest in proceedings cannot thereafter object that subsection (1) has not been complied with in the case of those proceedings.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
(4)  No judgment in default of a notice of intention to contest or not contest may be given against a State except on proof that subsection (1) has been complied with and that the time for filing and serving a notice of intention to contest or not contest as extended by subsection (2) has expired.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
(5)  A copy of any judgment given against a State in default of a notice of intention to contest or not contest must be transmitted through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore, to the ministry of foreign affairs of that State and any time for applying to have the judgment set aside (whether prescribed by Rules of Court or otherwise) begins to run 2 months after the date on which the copy of the judgment is received at that ministry.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
(6)  Subsection (1) does not prevent the service of a writ or other document in any manner to which the State has agreed and subsections (2) and (4) do not apply where service is effected in that manner.
(7)  This section is not to be construed as applying to proceedings against a State by way of counterclaim or to an action in rem; and subsection (1) is not to be construed as affecting any Rules of Court whereby permission is required for the service of process outside the jurisdiction.
[Act 25 of 2021 wef 01/04/2022]
Other procedural privileges
15.—(1)  No penalty by way of committal or fine shall be imposed in respect of any failure or refusal by or on behalf of a State to disclose or produce any document or other information for the purposes of proceedings to which it is a party.
(2)  Subject to subsections (3) and (4) —
(a)relief must not be given against a State by way of injunction or order for specific performance or for the recovery of land or other property; and
(b)the property of a State must not be subject to any process for the enforcement of a judgment or an arbitration award or, in an action in rem, for its arrest, detention or sale.
(3)  Subsection (2) does not prevent the giving of any relief or the issue of any process with the written consent of the State concerned; and that consent (which may be contained in a prior agreement) may be expressed so as to apply to a limited extent or generally; but a provision merely submitting to the jurisdiction of the courts is not to be regarded as a consent for the purposes of this subsection.
(4)  Subsection (2)(b) does not prevent the issue of any process in respect of property which is for the time being in use or intended for use for commercial purposes.
(5)  The head of a State’s diplomatic mission in Singapore, or the person for the time being performing his or her functions, is deemed to have authority to give on behalf of the State the consent mentioned in subsection (3) and, for the purposes of subsection (4), his or her certificate to the effect that any property is not in use or intended for use by or on behalf of the State for commercial purposes must be accepted as sufficient evidence of that fact unless the contrary is proved.